<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fireworks CS4 Photoshop Integration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html</link>
	<description>The How-To Magazine for Everything Adobe. Quick tips and tutorials for the entire Adobe Creative Suite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:31:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Babbage</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-38542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Babbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-38542</guid>
		<description>@Alex:Sorry for the delay, Alex - but by now you should be aware of the patch offered by Adobe. It solves many of hte major text issues.

@Vik: Generally, I find it faster/easier to work in Fireworks for page development. The faster I can do things, the sooner I can move on to other projects. That said, if Photoshop is your tool of preference , then you will probably work faster there. The key is to work with the software, give yourself a little time to see the strengths of FW. 

As for animation, FW has far better drawing/illustration tools that Flash, so if you have the need to do detailed illustration work, you might want to start in FW and then move to Flash.

@David:I assume you mean font rendering looks different than it did in CS3? You&#039;re right. But prior to the introduction of the Adobe font engine in FW, there were many complaints that text was so different in AI and PS, when compared to PS. The introduction of this type engine hopefully will improve the integration between the products. I hope we see more of this (and improved stability) in the next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alex:Sorry for the delay, Alex &#8211; but by now you should be aware of the patch offered by Adobe. It solves many of hte major text issues.</p>
<p>@Vik: Generally, I find it faster/easier to work in Fireworks for page development. The faster I can do things, the sooner I can move on to other projects. That said, if Photoshop is your tool of preference , then you will probably work faster there. The key is to work with the software, give yourself a little time to see the strengths of FW. </p>
<p>As for animation, FW has far better drawing/illustration tools that Flash, so if you have the need to do detailed illustration work, you might want to start in FW and then move to Flash.</p>
<p>@David:I assume you mean font rendering looks different than it did in CS3? You&#8217;re right. But prior to the introduction of the Adobe font engine in FW, there were many complaints that text was so different in AI and PS, when compared to PS. The introduction of this type engine hopefully will improve the integration between the products. I hope we see more of this (and improved stability) in the next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-38293</link>
		<dc:creator>David R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-38293</guid>
		<description>Great concept, except that the font rendering still looks totally different in Fireworks CS4. When it&#039;s not crashing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great concept, except that the font rendering still looks totally different in Fireworks CS4. When it&#8217;s not crashing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vik Ritelis</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-25388</link>
		<dc:creator>Vik Ritelis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-25388</guid>
		<description>Thanks you Jim for your tutorials. A couple of questions: 1) If all the elements of a design can be created in Photoshop why use Fireworks at all? Is optimization of images the only reason?
2) If I want to create animation and interactivity in Flash, how far should I go in Fireworks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you Jim for your tutorials. A couple of questions: 1) If all the elements of a design can be created in Photoshop why use Fireworks at all? Is optimization of images the only reason?<br />
2) If I want to create animation and interactivity in Flash, how far should I go in Fireworks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-24911</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-24911</guid>
		<description>These would be great features, if it weren&#039;t for the fact that the redesigned type engine in Fireworks CS4 is fatally buggy. The type rendering issues in CS4 have kept me from upgrading from CS3. Ironically, better integration and conversion with Photoshop was the only reason I wanted to upgrade to CS4, especially the font rendering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These would be great features, if it weren&#8217;t for the fact that the redesigned type engine in Fireworks CS4 is fatally buggy. The type rendering issues in CS4 have kept me from upgrading from CS3. Ironically, better integration and conversion with Photoshop was the only reason I wanted to upgrade to CS4, especially the font rendering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Username, Graphics relation.. Second Opinion? - DarkZtar</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-22001</link>
		<dc:creator>Username, Graphics relation.. Second Opinion? - DarkZtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-22001</guid>
		<description>[...] PDF File from a Multipage Document in Fireworks CS4  Creating a Cool Website Header in Fireworks  Fireworks CS4 Photoshop Integration (video)  Fireworks CS4 Layout Tools (video)  Fireworks CS4 Beta for Web Design  Fireworks 101  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PDF File from a Multipage Document in Fireworks CS4  Creating a Cool Website Header in Fireworks  Fireworks CS4 Photoshop Integration (video)  Fireworks CS4 Layout Tools (video)  Fireworks CS4 Beta for Web Design  Fireworks 101  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 35 Excellent Adobe Fireworks Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-10335</link>
		<dc:creator>35 Excellent Adobe Fireworks Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-10335</guid>
		<description>[...] Fireworks CS4 Photoshop Integration (video) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fireworks CS4 Photoshop Integration (video) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Babbage</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-8908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Babbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-8908</guid>
		<description>Pretty much, yes. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much, yes. <img src='http://www.layersmagazine.com/admin/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saki</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/fireworks-cs4-photoshop-integration.html/comment-page-1#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>saki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3071#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>metting of two titans one for web one for print</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>metting of two titans one for web one for print</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
