<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html</link>
	<description>The How-To Magazine for Everything Adobe. Quick tips and tutorials for the entire Adobe Creative Suite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:13:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gianna</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html/comment-page-1#comment-51157</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3550#comment-51157</guid>
		<description>I have a Nikon D90 and I just recently purchased a D700.  I tried to compare both cameras by using a Nikkor 50mm 1.8D lens on both, and noticed that the D90 shoots faster than the D700.  I was using the same apeture setting, with the same subject, same lighting on apeture-priority mode.   Why is my D700 slower than the D90, isn&#039;t this lens compatible with both DX and FX format? I was wondering if my D700 is defective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Nikon D90 and I just recently purchased a D700.  I tried to compare both cameras by using a Nikkor 50mm 1.8D lens on both, and noticed that the D90 shoots faster than the D700.  I was using the same apeture setting, with the same subject, same lighting on apeture-priority mode.   Why is my D700 slower than the D90, isn&#8217;t this lens compatible with both DX and FX format? I was wondering if my D700 is defective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luigi Monaco</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html/comment-page-1#comment-29499</link>
		<dc:creator>Luigi Monaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3550#comment-29499</guid>
		<description>I got it in August ´08 and after half a year of using it, I even love it more. Very happy with it, nothing more to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got it in August ´08 and after half a year of using it, I even love it more. Very happy with it, nothing more to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html/comment-page-1#comment-9726</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3550#comment-9726</guid>
		<description>A quick question if I may you mentioned the Nikon’s 70-200mm f/2.8 VR lens (is this a DX lens) is not effected by DX crop on the D700 I have the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 DX doe&#039;s this lens also escape the DX issue with the FX sensor.
Cheers

Martin Powell (UK) 
Considering the D700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick question if I may you mentioned the Nikon’s 70-200mm f/2.8 VR lens (is this a DX lens) is not effected by DX crop on the D700 I have the Sigma 70-200 F2.8 DX doe&#8217;s this lens also escape the DX issue with the FX sensor.<br />
Cheers</p>
<p>Martin Powell (UK)<br />
Considering the D700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html/comment-page-1#comment-7191</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3550#comment-7191</guid>
		<description>It is on my list for the new year! Cannot wait!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is on my list for the new year! Cannot wait!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kelby&#8217;s D700 Review &#124; Blog and Layers TV Contest Winners &#124; The Least (and most) Important CS4 Feature &#124; Living In Layers &#124; Layers Magazine: For Everything Adobe</title>
		<link>http://www.layersmagazine.com/nikon-d700-review-by-scott-kelby.html/comment-page-1#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kelby&#8217;s D700 Review &#124; Blog and Layers TV Contest Winners &#124; The Least (and most) Important CS4 Feature &#124; Living In Layers &#124; Layers Magazine: For Everything Adobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.layersmagazine.com/?p=3550#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to go to the Scott Kelby review of the D700 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to go to the Scott Kelby review of the D700 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
